The tradeoff is complexity. The microcode must be carefully arranged so that the instructions in delay slots are either useful setup for both paths, or at least harmless if the redirect fires. Not every case is as clean as RETF. When a PLA redirect interrupts an LCALL, the return address is already pushed onto the microcode call stack (yes, the 386 has a microcode call stack) -- the redirected code must account for this stale entry. When multiple protection tests overlap, or when a redirect fires during a delay slot of another jump, the control flow becomes hard to reason about. During the FPGA core implementation, protection delay slot interactions were consistently the most difficult bugs to track down.
更多详细新闻请浏览新京报网 www.bjnews.com.cn。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
理一县、兴一省、治一国，政贵有恒。“防止走弯路、翻烧饼”“不要城头变幻大王旗”“不能有临时工的思想”“不要换一届领导就兜底翻”“更不要为了显示所谓政绩去另搞一套”，而是坚强扛起“当代中国共产党人的庄严历史责任”。，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
I'm building an 80386-compatible core in SystemVerilog and blogging the process. In the previous post, we looked at how the 386 reuses one barrel shifter for all shift and rotate instructions. This time we move from real mode to protected and talk about protection.